{"id":1561,"date":"2024-09-17T21:17:01","date_gmt":"2024-09-17T21:17:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ahggolf.com\/?post_type=product&#038;p=1561"},"modified":"2025-06-21T17:51:17","modified_gmt":"2025-06-21T17:51:17","slug":"mizuno-jpx-800-pro-4-pw-7-clubs-dynamic-gold-s300-shafts-the-best-mizunos-ever","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/ahggolf.com\/?product=mizuno-jpx-800-pro-4-pw-7-clubs-dynamic-gold-s300-shafts-the-best-mizunos-ever","title":{"rendered":"MIZUNO JPX 800 PRO 4-PW &#8211; 7 CLUBS DYNAMIC GOLD S300 SHAFTS &#8211; THE BEST MIZUNO&#8217;S EVER?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>CLUB TYPE:\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0IRONS SET<br \/>\nMAKE:\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 MIZUNO<br \/>\nMODEL:\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0JPX 900 PRO<br \/>\nLENGTH:<br \/>\nCONDITION:\u00a0 \u00a0Used<br \/>\nWeight:<br \/>\nLie Angle:\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a059.5 &#8211; 63 Degree<\/p>\n<p>Shaft:\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 DYNAMIC GOLD S300 SHAFTS<\/p>\n<p>Loft:\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a024 &#8211; 46 Degree<br \/>\nCost New:\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a3120 per club (\u00a3840 for 7 clubs)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Postage Costs: Free Postage in the UK, all other postage to Ireland, EU and Global will be at cost<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>REVIEWS:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The following reviews are from various sources across the internet and not the opinions of AHG Golf.<\/strong><\/p>\n<h1>Mizuno JPX800 Pro Irons Review<\/h1>\n<article>The Mizuno JPX800 Pro iron is part of the JPX range that has been around in Japan for a while and is now moving outside the Orient to replace the MX range.Mizuno say their aim is to create \u2018Balanced Performance\u2019 by combining feel, control, forgiveness, distance and looks in a single clubhead without one compromising the other.For those who want a forged iron with a little more playability, there is also a JPX800 Pro version which is forged rather than cast like the standard JPX800 Iron. Mizuno say this is a players iron \u2018elevates cosmetics to levels not seen on an MP iron\u2019 and that is certainly true if this is important to you.<\/p>\n<p>However it has a bigger sweet area and higher MOI than the MX-300 and MX-200 in a more compact head so it is ideal for good players who want a little more help than the MP irons usually offer. Compared to the MP-53 iron, the JPX800 Pro has more offset, a thicker topline and higher flight. The long irons in particular look great and are very good. Like the standard version the pro version also has a cavity blend as you go down the set to combine forgiveness with looks and performance.<\/p>\n<p>The grooves on the face conform to the 2010 condition of competition regulations. The JPX800 Pro version is more forgiving than the MP-53 irons as you would expect, but the MPs have it on looks.<\/p>\n<p>However Mizuno say that you can blend the sets to mix and match within the set if you want the best of both worlds.<\/p>\n<\/article>\n<div id=\"article-rating\" class=\"clearfix\">\n<div>\n<div>Golfalot Rating:\u00a0<span class=\"er\">5<\/span> stars (If we had any more stars they would get them too)<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<div>Overall Rating &#8211; 5 stars:<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<h2>Mizuno JPX-800 Pro Forged Iron Review<\/h2>\n<p>Part of the JPX series (which replaces Mizuno\u2019s MX line) The 800 Pro is what could be called a\u00a0<strong>transitional game improvement iron<\/strong>. \u00a0The head is less bulky than the standard JPX-800 (narrower sole, thinner top line), it features less offset, and visually, to me anyway, it looks a bit more refined than the average game improvement iron.<\/p>\n<p>As far as shaft length is concerned, Mizuno hasn\u2019t done anything sneaky (not that it\u2019s a big secret anymore) to play to the distance crowd. \u00a0Standard lengths are inline with those of their MP-53 and MP-68 irons. \u00a0Because the JPX-800 is part of Mizuno\u2019s game improvement series, it shouldn\u2019t come as any real surprise that the lofts are 1\u00b0 strong when compared to the MP-53\u00a0and 2\u00b0 stronger than the MP-68. \u00a0For some additional perspective consider the lofts of the JPX-800 are actually, on average 1\u00b0 weaker than those of the previously reviewed Cobra S2 forged, and by the time we get to the 7 iron (the club we use to conduct our performance tests), the JPX-800 is actually 2\u00b0 weaker than the equivalent Cobra S2.<\/p>\n<p>Although it\u2019s a bit of an apples to oranges comparison, from a consumer education standpoint, it\u2019s worth pointing out that there is a full 4\u00b0 difference between the 7-iron in the Cobra S2 Forged set, and the 7 iron in Mizuno\u2019s MP-68 set. \u00a0Obviously 31 does not equal 35, and yet they\u2019ve both got 7s stamped on their soles.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-6926 entered lazyloaded\" title=\"jpx_spec\" src=\"https:\/\/uploads.mygolfspy.com\/uploads\/jpx_spec.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"608\" height=\"261\" data-lazy-src=\"https:\/\/uploads.mygolfspy.com\/uploads\/jpx_spec.png\" data-ll-status=\"loaded\" \/><\/p>\n<p><strong>Material\u00a0Composition<\/strong>: 1025E \u201cPure Select\u201d mild carbon steel (Grain Flow Forged)<\/p>\n<p>Like the MP-53, the JPX-800 features Mizuno\u2019s Triple Cut Sole (most visible in the leading edge grind), which helps to ensure consistent performance from a variety of lies. \u00a0Though Mizuno bills the JPX-800 Pro as having a thinner top line (in comparison to the standard JPX), several of our testers, and in particular the lower handicap golfers, told us that the top line was a bit too thick for their tastes.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-6963 entered lazyloaded\" title=\"JPX-10\" src=\"https:\/\/uploads.mygolfspy.com\/uploads\/JPX-10.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"625\" height=\"415\" data-lazy-src=\"https:\/\/uploads.mygolfspy.com\/uploads\/JPX-10.jpg\" data-ll-status=\"loaded\" \/><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<h2><\/h2>\n<h2>Overall Performance<\/h2>\n<p>I encourage you to take a look at the complete results of our performance tests on the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/mygolfspy.com\/news-opinion\/mizuno-jpx-800-pro-raw-data\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Mizuno JPX-800 interactive page<\/a>. \u00a0In addition to sorting all of our data by golfer,\u00a0we\u2019ve added the ability to filter by handicap and swing speed.<\/p>\n<p>While this is only the 2nd time we\u2019ve applied our new scoring system, the results are extremely compelling. \u00a0Because we\u2019re so early into this new process, as much as we\u2019d love each club to stand on its own, it\u2019s impossible not to draw comparisons to the previously reviewed Cobra S2. \u00a0It\u2019s somewhat remarkable, though I believe completely in the results, that after days of testing both irons, there\u2019s a whopping .32 performance points between them. \u00a0The results certainly give some additional credence to the old adage that it\u2019s not the arrow, it\u2019s the\u00a0Indian.<\/p>\n<p>Like the S2, the JPX-800 is a very good all-around performer, which our tests suggest\u00a0<strong>you should definitely be looking at if you\u2019re \u00a0in the market for a forged game improvement iron.<\/strong><\/p>\n<h2><strong>MGS OVERALL PERFORMANCE SCORE: 89.27<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-6965 entered lazyloaded\" style=\"font-size: 30px;\" title=\"JPX-18\" src=\"https:\/\/uploads.mygolfspy.com\/uploads\/JPX-18.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"625\" height=\"415\" data-lazy-src=\"https:\/\/uploads.mygolfspy.com\/uploads\/JPX-18.jpg\" data-ll-status=\"loaded\" \/><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n<h2>SUBJECTIVE SCORING<\/h2>\n<p>We\u2019ve talked about subjective scoring in our forum. \u00a0We\u2019ve sent out surveys asking about how the individual subjective categories, and we\u2019ve received comments that suggest we shouldn\u2019t even bother including it. \u00a0We\u2019ve taken everything you\u2019ve told us to heart, which is why we\u2019ve broken out our performance and subjective scoring, and provided scores for every category\u00a0<strong>(down to 1\/100th of a point)<\/strong>. \u00a0I think the subjective \u201cstuff\u201d is a huge part of the buying process, especially in situations where the performance between clubs is extremely similar. \u00a0It\u2019s impossible to discount the subjective entirely.<\/p>\n<p>Another reason why subjective scoring matters is that, as I\u2019ve mentioned before, there is very often a fundamental disconnect between how a given golfer thinks a club performs in his hands, and how it actually does. \u00a0Our performance tests have revealed these\u00a0discrepancies\u00a0time and time again, and continuously illustrate why club reviews based\u00a0solely on one or two guys opinion, and that aren\u2019t supported by any data beyond \u201cI think\u201d or \u201cI feel\u201d, are woefully inadequate. \u00a0The subjective perspective gives us an indicator of how closely perception is to reality.<\/p>\n<h2>Feel<\/h2>\n<p>More than anything else Mizuno is a company known for producing irons with unrivaled feel. \u00a0While our testers almost to a man rated the JPX-800 Pro higher than its competitors in this space, many who\u2019ve hit Mizunos previously felt that the JPX-800 was by no way a disappointment.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, the guys moving from cast game improvement clubs had nothing but positive things to say. \u00a0In the end, most of our testers rated them as an 9, although a single 8, and a couple of 9.5s were also in the mix. \u00a0Brian, who didn\u2019t take part in the detailed performance testing, told us that he thought the weighting of the JPX-800 Pro was absolutely perfect.<\/p>\n<p>For my money, the JPX-800 pro offers very good feel, but if we\u2019re being brutally honest, it\u2019s not on the same level with those in the MP series.<\/p>\n<h2>MGS Feel Score: 87.54<\/h2>\n<h2>Perceived Distance<\/h2>\n<p>Given that most of our testers hit the JPX-800 on the same day they hit the S2, it\u2019s not a huge surprise that they perceived it as being the shorter of the two clubs \u2013 it is. \u00a0That said, we\u2019re not talking about a tremendous difference in our tester\u2019s minds. \u00a0Though a couple rated distance as a perfect 10, most of the 10s we saw for the S2s were replaced by 9s, and the 9s were replaced with 8s. \u00a0While the JPX-800 Pro is probably longer than our testers give it credit for, their for the most part match up with the results of our tests.<\/p>\n<h2>Tester Perceived Distance Score: 95.21<\/h2>\n<h2>Perceived Accuracy<\/h2>\n<p>We\u2019re uncovering an interesting trend with our recent tests. \u00a0It seems golfers are more accurate than they think they are. \u00a0This of course is the complete opposite of what we see with distance (where most golfers assume they\u2019re 10 yards longer than our tests results prove). \u00a0With accuracy, golfers seem to have low expectations, with the actual results often being better than golfers give themselves credit for.<\/p>\n<p>With respect to the Mizunos, it\u2019 not like anyone (with the possible exception of Dan) was out there throwing darts, but they certainly performed better than some of the ratings (as low as 6) suggested. \u00a0As with our\u00a0perceived\u00a0distance scores, a number of 9s and even a 10 helped to offset the lower rankings.<\/p>\n<h2>Tester Perceived Accuracy Score: \u00a087.54<\/h2>\n<h2>Likelihood of Purchase<\/h2>\n<p>Likelihood of Purchase (or\u00a0<strong>LOP<\/strong>\u00a0as I like to call it) accounts for the smallest percentage of our subjective score. \u00a0It\u2019s the closest MyGolfSpy gets to \u201cdemand\u201d or buzz\u201d. \u00a0We differ from others in that we don\u2019t ask our testers to give us rating until after they have actually hit the club. \u00a0Our LOP question is simply this: \u201cIf you were going to replace the irons in your bag today,\u00a0how\u00a0likely is it that you would purchase the irons you tested today\u201d? \u00a0<strong>Asking somebody if they like an iron is one thing. \u00a0Getting them to spend their money on them is an entirely different\u00a0proposition.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Maybe it\u2019s the clubs we\u2019ve tested so far. \u00a0As I\u2019ve pointed out several times already, the forged game-improvement space is golf equipment\u2019s unchartered water. \u00a0Many golfers don\u2019t know there are clubs in this space, fewer still are looking for them. \u00a0There could also be something in the \u00a0way we\u2019re phrasing the question, but whatever it is, LOP numbers thus far are well below what we would have expected.<\/p>\n<p>From a percentages perspective, LOP barely counts at in our scoring (5% of the subjective score), but we do like the insight it provides into how golfers really feel about the clubs they\u2019ve just tested. \u00a0While most of the feedback we received on the JPX-800 pro suggests an \u201cI\u2019d think about it, but not on the top of my list\u201d mentality, a couple of scores suggest a \u201cnot a chance in the world\u201d\u00a0mindset. \u00a0As per usual, those guys were largely balanced by a couple of testers who absolutely love the JPX-800 Pro irons.<\/p>\n<p>Personally, I gave them a 7. \u00a0They\u2019re a fantastic iron, but if I\u2019m thinking forgiveness, I probably step down to the standard model, or perhaps look at something like a Ping K15. \u00a0If I\u2019m inclined to go performance, feel, or looks, I probably step up to the MP-53. \u00a0Such is the fate of irons in this space I think. \u00a0They offer great balance, but probably not the best of anything.<\/p>\n<h2>CONCLUSION<\/h2>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>This isn\u2019t the first time Mizuno has had a club in this space (they\u2019ve been doing it for years), but the fact that they\u2019re no longer alone tells me that forged game improvement irons might be developing a broader market appeal. \u00a0Granted, the JPX-800 Pro, \u00a0a transitional iron \u201cpro\u201d enough to find its way into the bag of Charles Howell III,\u00a0is probably at the extreme end of the category, but that only serves to remind us that there are plenty of guys playing less forgiving irons than they probably ought to be (yours truly included).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>CLUB TYPE:\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0IRONS SET MAKE:\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 MIZUNO MODEL:\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0JPX 900 PRO LENGTH: CONDITION:\u00a0 \u00a0Used Weight: Lie<span class=\"excerpt-hellip\"> [\u2026]<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":1562,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0},"product_cat":[20],"product_tag":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ahggolf.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/product\/1561"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ahggolf.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/product"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ahggolf.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/product"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ahggolf.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1561"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ahggolf.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1562"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ahggolf.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1561"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"product_cat","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ahggolf.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fproduct_cat&post=1561"},{"taxonomy":"product_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ahggolf.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fproduct_tag&post=1561"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}